When you want to mount it to a microphone arm, you may easily remove it from its mount by sliding it into a ring and clicking it into position. The mic can be supported either vertically or horizontally by adjusting the base itself. The stand’s and mic’s construction quality is nothing particularly exceptional. They are adequate but lack distinction. Despite the fact that the mic mounting threads are located directly on the bottom, giving the impression that the microphone is mounted on a stick, it is always preferable to have the mic close to your face rather than on the desk. also you will check our article on HyperX SoloCast review.
HyperX SoloCast review: Design
SoloCast is essentially a competitor to Blue Snowball Ice, a convenient and affordable small USB microphone; SoloCast is priced about the same as Snowball Ice, but the smaller microphone and stand make Blue’s design seem titanic. However, the SoloCast’s stand has more adjustment options than the Snowball Ice’s basic tripod; the SoloCast can rotate left or right, and both microphones can rotate upward. This is a very useful feature if you need to position this microphone low enough to be placed under a monitor or in front of a keyboard so that it does not obstruct your view of the keyboard. This microphone is better than the Snowball Ice because it has a built-in mute button. In fact, it is more of a touch sensor than a button, as it operates with less force. As a result, the microphone does not pick up any tapping or knocking noises when muted or unmuted. The range of integrated controls also extends only so far. Unfortunately, there are no volume or gain controls, and there is no headphone jack for microphone monitoring.The QuadCast S and its extensive hardware features clearly set it apart from the SoloCast. inch threaded stand or arm compatible, so you can always add your own stand if you want something bigger and better.
Features
SoloCast increases this dimension significantly when used with the foundation already in place in the box. Functionality is further enhanced by the ability to tilt the microphone and rotate it into one of five preset modes. Weighing 430 g (261 g without the base), but with the base included, SoloCast is pleasantly light and quite portable compared to more expensive microphones that weigh well over 1 kg. A telescoping arm would have been nice here as well, but you can easily add a third-party device for that purpose; the SoloCast works with the same 3/8″ and 5/8″ wide threaded setup as most boom arms and mic stands. The device itself, however, has almost no controls whatsoever. You can only use uni-directional recording patterns, and you can’t switch between them, and you have to change the gain in the application you are recording from. For us, this is nothing more than a minor inconvenience, but for those accustomed to dedicated controls, it may be a deal-breaker. In fact, the mute button on top of the device is the only tactile button. A large LED glows red while recording, which is an alternative to frantically searching for mute in the app. However, we did encounter a problem with the LED light sometimes flashing during mute, which interfered with recording.
Software
There are few hardware or software changes, as is typical with entry-level microphones, but SoloCast has added a physical mute button, a clear advantage over the Seiren Mini. This button is located on top of the microphone capsule. Instead of a click-down switch, it is a touch-activated pad, which reduces noise during operation. When not muted, a single indicator light flashes occasionally; when muted, it flashes continuously. The fact that it is not customary to record in this simple manner is another criticism of its contemporaries. In terms of hardware features, I only mentioned the various sizes of mic mounts and adjustable stands in the two aforementioned threads. Also, thankfully, no software is required for SoloCast to work properly. Anyone who uses headsets, keyboards, and mice from multiple manufacturers, each with its own profiling software, will understand how burdensome it can be to install yet another program to adjust some microphone settings, with the Blue Elgato are exceptions, but these apps include fairly strict default settings for broadcasting and recording in their software; SoloCast allows you to connect your microphone to your DAW and add plug-ins to your tracks to make various adjustments.
HyperX SoloCast review: Sound Quality
SoloCast’s recording quality is again its strongest point, other than being a bit gain heavy the dial would be great. Its cardioid pattern recording could easily compete with mics like the Blue Yeti Nano or JLab Talk at almost half the cost. It sounds noticeably better than the Snowball Ice, which is perhaps more important; when you listen to audio recorded with the SoloCast, it sounds richer, with less reverberation. In addition, there is less background noise; the SoloCast may be better suited as a microphone for PC gaming or for casual broadcast use, since the clicks of a mouse or the clack of a mechanical keyboard are not bothersome. However, if you need a more professional podcasting microphone, especially if you need to record multiple speakers at once, the JLab Talk is worth purchasing. the SoloCast produces excellent audio for the price, but has only a unidirectional recording pattern and therefore can only reliably capture speech when you are speaking directly to the front of the device. Therefore, The Talk has stereo, omnidirectional, and bidirectional patterns for greater flexibility. However, unidirectional and SoloCast work fine for the majority of gaming and streaming applications.
HyperX SoloCast review: Performance
It is plug-and-play, so all you need to do is connect the microphone to your computer with the included USB cable. No software or other cumbersome setup is required. As a test, I recorded a podcast with this microphone and it worked great, so I think the HyperX SoloCast will satisfy at least beginners. It captures audio accurately, with the exception of breathing sounds. Listening to audio, which is typically crisp and low, sounds sweet. However, to pick up the sound adequately, it must be placed at an appropriate distance in front of the face. Otherwise, the voice quality may not be very good. Also, only sound from the front will be recorded. Therefore, if you are streaming, you may pick up both your voice and the sound of the keyboard if you do not place it in the proper position.
Price and availability
Additionally, this is the least expensive USB microphone available and is less expensive than all the other options on our list of top streaming and podcasting microphones. A few concessions were made to achieve this incredibly low price, but this product still offers excellent value.
Conclusion
For gamers on a tight budget, the new HyperX SoloCast microphones focus on providing more faithful speech recording. Cost is always a deciding factor when purchasing hardware, but it is not the only factor. When budgets are limited, one must always consider what features and comforts can be omitted while still accomplishing the task at hand. As a content creator, you’re probably deciding what’s most important to you, whether it’s creating a great stream or simply recording great audio and video; HyperX has seized the opportunity and introduced its own low-cost mini-microphone.
